Calling for smaller class sizes is more than a convenient slogan – smaller classes are the mechanism for improving attainment (Peter Wilby, Inside track, 31 March). Computer-aided learning and teachers’ assistants?
Come on, that might apply in the private sector, but certainly not the state sector. Yes, state schools have teaching assistants (one per class) but usually they stop at Year 9. As for computer-aided learning, these resources are shared. Some schools are lucky to have 50 computers between 1,500 pupils, and so sometimes you’re lucky to use them once in a school year.
I teach in the state sector and achieve outstanding GCSE and A-level results in classes of 30. Yet I know I would do even better for every pupil if I had smaller class sizes. Wealthy parents are astute enough to realise this. That is why they send their children to fee-paying schools. Privileged parents use their economic advantage to purchase better teacher/pupil ratios and the associated benefits.
The smaller the class, the more time a teacher has with the individual child, hence the better their attainment. That is why the unions and some politicians go on about it. Indeed, that is why Jim Knight’s parents sent their son to Eltham College. Need I say more!
Published NewStatesman letters April 3rd
